IRC Chat Pages [ Back to Chat Index Page ]

IRC Chat Log, July 5, 1998
All rights reserved; publication rights to the text content of this chat log are shared by & between J. Altfeld & W. Anderson.
TOPIC: Language Patterns: A Step beyond the Basics! | |
| Jonathan | Well, for starters, thanks EVERYONE for coming, this is an excellent crowd! I'd like to give a BIG round of applause and a warm welcome to Wesley Anderson, NLP Trainer, and Doctor of Hypnotherapy in Atlanta GA. Thanks for coming to chat with me & the group here, Wesley! {applause ON!} Take it away! |
| Tranzpupy | Hip hip hooray |
| NLPerDude | I'm honored to be here, Jon |
| Tenore | Welcome!! |
| Dreamer | Yep, THANKS for coming |
| NLPerDude | First I'd like to get an idea of the backgrounds of those here. Briefly of course |
| Jonathan | Speak up folks -- a couple of words from you will help Wesley tailor the chat to you! |
| Dreamer | Well, I'm newbie at this... my first contact with NLP was with Ross's stuff |
| TokyoChas | ... is a beginner |
| Wendiii | Hypnotherapist for 2 1/2 years, sprinkled with NLP. Also have a new job doing sales training for a radio station. |
| Tangram | Just books, no training. |
| Tenore | I've read alot of NLP books and have a load of tapes; no formal training yet. |
| Occum | Relative beginner with a strong interest in persuasion, to that end language patterns, etc. :-) |
| EnchntCat | Many NLP books and tapes, no training yet |
| Tranzpupy | Jonathan's NLP Practitioner Training! |
| Stefan | Just books, and NLP practitioner study buddy. Been doing NLP for about a year. No real training yet. |
| moodswing | I have done research with past lives and NLP Anchoring powerfulstates of pastlives in the present |
| sabren | (I'm an ex- reading teacher, a.p.nlp junkie, and one-time apprentice to a particular trainer.. |
| glen_IMOP | Read a few books. Fledgling practicing so far. |
| MichaelR | ...books...tapes...increasing amounts of practice... |
| NLPerDude | I'd like to start with a little history of how I got interested in the L side of NLP. I started out with a weekend hypnosis training. I started reading as much as I could, and memorizing scripts. I thought there were some magic words... If I only said them my clients would be healed, or at least reach their goals. Disappointment followed. I read a few NLP books like Frogs into Princes and began to appreciate the way that Bandler and Grinder used words was more than rote scripting, and I bagan to study Erickson It became clear that language patterns are only effective when ued in conjunction with all of the other NLP communications skills. Rapport, calibration and so on. So what I want to address tonight is how to use it all together. You with me so far? |
| MichaelR, tranzpupy, Stefan, TokyoChas, Occum, EnchntCat, wendii, Tenore, tangram, Jonathan, disguised, moodswing, Dreamer | Yes. |
| NLPerDude | I started by memorizing scripts. So when I read my first NLP book, I recognized it as HYPNOSIS. The language of hypnosis had become familiar, though there were no labels or categories for my conscious mind yet. The next step was in reading Trance-Formations. |
| Jonathan | I love that book! |
| NLPerDude | The Milton model was spelled out and I began to make more distinctions. So I practiced by writing out paragraphs, using each pattern at least once in each. The result was that the patterns began to flow from my lips effortlessly. Now my strategy is to simply keep my outcome in mind and talk. The patterns to support my outcome are just there. Please note the "just there" in that last sentence. It's trance language. I am speaking the trance stuff in a trance of sorts myself. Keep in mind that I'm having a lot of fun with it, too! |
| Tenore | So immersion seems to be a pretty good start as far as mastering patterns? |
| NLPerDude | Right on tenore. Immersion is what I've found that works best for me. |
| Wild1 | Is a pattern just a collection of words or is the process a pattern in itself??? |
| Jonathan | Yes Wild1 ;) |
| NLPerDude | Thanks, Tom. That's one of the points that I most wanted to make tonight. |
| Wild1 | I am quicker than I look |
| Occum | The writing out makes sense to me. |
| NLPerDude | The langage patterns are not important for their own sake. It's the web of trance and the whole gestalt of the communication that make the language work. The writing is very powerful in learning, and I'd recommend reading too. |
| Occum | Thats why incongruency will mess it up right? Its like a painting its the whole thats beautiful. |
| TokyoChas | Reading aloud, for practice, you mean? |
| NLPerDude | If you want to really get into the patterns read some of the posts on alt.psychology.nlp for the patterns of logic. Congruence is imperative of course. |
| moodswing | I was learning english and the first english o learned was this patterns, |
| Wild1 | Explain logical patterns Wes |
| NLPerDude | Logical patterns - if you examine the train of thought in some posts, you will find trance logic to be the motivator of persuasion, rather than straightforward logic or facts. Y'all with me? |
| TokyoChas, moodswing, Occum, tranzpupy, Jonathan, MichaelR, ddii | y |
| Wild1 | How about a short example |
| Dreamer | So, you're saying we're all persuaded by those patterns, wes? |
| Jonathan | Hmmmm. |
| NLPerDude | One of my favorites was a post by Stever Robbins arguing that NLP could not be done in text! We're not all persuaded by those patterns, but we may need to take a second look to realize that we may not agree. |
| Wild1 | I loved that post |
| NLPerDude | I did too, Tom. Stever used all the patterns of NLP to argue that it couldn't be effective |
| Jonathan | Wesley - I'm curious -- do you mean that people are letting the patterns get in the way of, and be the motivator of the posts, rather than letting the issues at hand drive the posts -- with the patterns used in support of the issues? |
| NLPerDude | Yes, the posts are examples of trance induction and suggestion... to put it one way |
| Wild1 | It seems that the patterns guide the reader to the point of view of the author |
| NLPerDude | Yes Tom |
| Dreamer | And what's your opinion, Wes? Can you persuade someone just by throwing text in his/her face? |
| Jonathan | Lets clarify that ;) Stever didn't use a lot of grammatically incorrect patterns... He used a lot of NLP patterns within the framework of correct grammar and easy readability. He did a lot with presuppositions! His argument was very strong in presenting how many milton model intended grammatical inconsistencies did not work well or read well online! |
| NLPerDude | Correct Jon. Grammatically correct sentences can be Milton model patterns too. Stever argued a lot of different points. I agree with him that it's not possible to use tonality much via text, but that doen't lead me to agree that persuasion or even some therapy can't be done |
| Wendiii | Advertisers do it all the time |
| Jonathan | Hah! Yes they do wendii! OK. Wesley, let me ask a question about your development with these patterns. Once you started to achieve greater fluidity, through practice and usage, what did you learn... where did that take you? |
| Dreamer | :) OK, Wes... good question, Jonathan |
| NLPerDude | I started to develop my skills at reframing, context/content as oppossed the the 6 step technique. Bandler's use of humor really grabed me and I started getting my clients to laugh at their "problems" |
| Dreamer | Kind of changing their believes? |
| Wild1 | So Humor is a type of pattern.... |
| NLPerDude | Yes, humor is one of my greatest weaopns in changing beliefs. One of my clients started complaining about a relationship that she was in and I had her crying tears of laughter for 10 minutes and she could care less abotu the guy now! |
| Jonathan | :) I love those stories --- did you do a followup with her? |
| NLPerDude | She never had any more to do with the guy |
| Jonathan | Thats what I call generative change... because its one thing to change a state or demeanor in your office... another to have it be generative and have her maintain the laughter and the ease when she sees him again or gets back home to the existing anchors! |
| Dreamer | Yes, like ross would say... how to laugh yourself to the ultimate seduction |
| NLPerDude | Humor is a type of reframing, and leads to anchor collapsing. |
| Jonathan | Sure does! |
| NLPerDude | One of the other things I want to touch on is the oppostie of talking... which is listening. I make mistakes when I'm talking. When I listen to what I say, I can correct myself immediately. |
| Jonathan | (laughing) -- me too, Wesley... sometimes I make *really* good mistakes and then I utilize them ;) |
| Dreamer | What do you mean by that, wes? |
| NLPerDude | When I listen to what I'm saying, and I say "I hope you don't feel Too bad about X" I'l switch it to I hope you are startign to feel good |
| Dreamer | Is that some kind of future-pacing? So, it's a little trick with words? |
| NLPerDude | It's simply directing attention in the direction that I'd like to go. Yes, a type of future-pacing. |
| Dreamer | OK... please go on |
| NLPerDude | It's not so much a trick as a means of aligning every part of the communication. Congruency |
| Tenore | You've no doubt noticed that Wes is going to tell us what he is hear to say.. |
| NLPerDude | I'm open to taking another direction too, if you have questions. |
| TokyoChas | Enjoying following your progress |
| Dreamer | Future-pacing helps on that, i'd say |
| Jonathan | Hmmm actually thats a really useful direction to go in... about how to reframe the directions we choose! Lets talk about that! Language and Directions... |
| NLPerDude | Well. Bandler likes to say that anything can mean anything else, which is content reframing |
| Dreamer | Kind of meta-model basic, right? |
| NLPerDude | Yes. The meta model is oneof my basic tools for both info-gathering and changework . |
| Jonathan | OK. So you use the Meta Model for information gathering.... what kinds of language clues/cues might you listen for... that aren't necessarily Meta Model related? |
| NLPerDude | Metaphors. Someone might say that they just need some distance on their problem... I listen for their analog marking too. I DON'T want to quit nail biting |
| Jonathan | What exactly would that example indicate to you? |
| Tangram | What's analog marking? |
| Jonathan | Analog marking is a way that people can EMPHASIZE or MARK OUT certain words.... to convey a different set of meanings... indeed an entirely different set of suggestions... in the language. |
| Tangram | Why would you listen for that, outside of the normal process of understanding what someone's saying? |
| NLPerDude | I'm back after a brief sip enforced vacation |
| Tranzpupy | I really think YOU should SHUT that window UP! |
| Jonathan | Here's an example: "I don't want people to LAUGH at politicians... because its HARDER for them to do their job...." Two separate communications offered to you. The literal content, and the capitalized content: LAUGH HARDER! Make sense? |
| Tangram | Yes. Do people really notice that? And what would you get out of "I DON'T want to quit smoking"? |
| NLPerDude | I'd get back from the DON'T that there was a multiple set of impulses going on at the same time: yes and no both. |
| Jonathan | Tangram -- people don't usually notice it consciously. But the human brain works sequentially and does respond to anchoring... so I'd say, YES, people do respond and hear those messages, though not always consciously. |
| Dreamer | The power of the Subconscious mind. |
| NLPerDude | I would likely reflect back both messages to the person as a way of getting raport with both sides |
| Dreamer | Wes, that's about smoking? |
| Tangram | What might you say to reflect both of those messages back? |
| NLPerDude | Yes Jon, we do get both messages even if we don't notice them both consciously. Yes the DON'T would indicate that they want to quit and keep smoking both. I might nod and say "so you Don't want to quit..." or I might tell them that they must want to keep smoking or they'd have quit already. |
| Jonathan | I like the latter, it validates both sides concurrently |
| NLPerDude | Responding in two channels (nodding & the verbal channel) can be a great confuser, and it's usually good for a laugh on the client's part, too! |
| Dreamer | It sounds like a kind of reversed psychology to me |
| NLPerDude | Reversed psychology usually refers to a polarity response in which the other person does the opposite of what they're asked to do. |
| Dreamer | Yes... and you want them to quit smoking, right? Using that you could make them quit smoking, I think!!! But back on the subject |
| Jonathan | Taking this as an example, what directions are they choosing when they say something like "I DON'T want to quit smoking." And what do you like to do with directions in goal-setting... and how do you help them achieve better results? |
| NLPerDude | In the case of a double message, the person is usually conscious of the outcome that they're paying me to help them with, the other I take as a message that I need to address the functions of smoking in another way that the unconscious finds pleasing |
| Dreamer | So, you're kind of invinting them to see both parts? The yes and no of smoking? |
| NLPerDude | I wish I could make people quit smoking Dreamer, It would make my life SO much easier |
| Dreamer | Would it to all of us? Do you smoke? |
| NLPerDude | I may or may not invite conscious recognition of both sides. Ususally I do as a way of enhancing the person's rapport with him/herself. I don't smoke. |
| Wild1 | Wes, is it an issue of making people do things or moving them in a direction they want to go, with the tools to do it |
| Dreamer | Thought so... NLP is supposed to give you the strength to make better persons of ourselves |
| NLPerDude | My clients sometimes think that I can MAKE them do things or not. I have the ability to influence them and set a context in which positive change is likely. |
| Wild1 | I never liked the "make people do things" mentality |
| Tenore | I know someone who is fairly constantly focused on the negative side of things, and,it seems to me, covertly critical in their language towards others, using statements that could imply blame or guilt. When I listen to this person, I either get upset or want to argue them out of whatever they are saying...what would be a more elegant thing to do, using language patterns? |
| Dreamer | Great question, tenore |
| TokyoChas | Work on not being iritated? |
| NLPerDude | Here's a great pattern for you to use. Say "yes...and" add something to what the other person says that will reframe it in a positive light |
| Tenore | Aside from that, TokoyoChas :) |
| TokyoChas | :) |
| Jonathan | OK! |
| NLPerDude | Yes the person talks negatively, and It's a great opportunity to learn ablut reframing |
| Jonathan | Try me, Wes: respond to this with that approach: |
| NLPerDude | OK! |
| Jonathan | "Damn, Wesley, every time I come home, my roommate just pisses me off. He won't keep the place clean." |
| NLPerDude | Yes that can be a pisser, and I wonder if you recognize all of the good qualities that your roommate has to share at those moments too, or do you just wait til later? |
| Jonathan | "Well, he makes a great meatloaf. But he waits at least 3 hours to clean up the kitchen." |
| NLPerDude | Yes, cleaning sooner would be good, and I think I'll have another slice |
| Jonathan | (Laughing!) "But how can I *make* him clean up the kitchen and the rest of the place more regularly?" |
| NLPerDude | Humor is the best reframe, appologies to Reader's Digest. If you want to make him do that I'd suggest a gun. How well would you respond to him trying to make you do something? |
| Jonathan | Hmmmmmmmm. That would be the start of a generative change, if I were the character in the example. |
| Tenore | I know someone who is an avoidance freak. In conversations, there is a on-going effort to get off the topic, to distract, to but-in when I'm speaking; this person is visibily nervous and somehwat flighty in behavior, looking askance, checking their watch, etc. I always leave the conversations feeling either misunderstood or un-understood!! How can I leave the next time feeling like we have connected, using language patterns? |
| finter | Jon - why not refame yourself to live in a messy house? Adapt to your surroundings! |
| Wild1 | Wes, Language Patterns oer only one part of what is going on ..Right? Rapport and everything else still counts |
| Jonathan | Wesley, in the last msg, takes "me" the clean-freak to the extremes of making someone do something... with the "gun" example. That's enough to "make" me back myself away from my present position of "making" someone clean up! |
| NLPerDude | Tenore it might be interesting to find out how that person signals to someone else that he understands and is listening by asking him directly. |
| Tenore | Great suggestion! |
| NLPerDude | Direct can be better than covert, especially when it comes to interpreting someone elses's communications. |
| Wild1 | Gee, direct comuniction... Who would of thunk of that??? |
| Jonathan | Lets take stock! Who's with us? (y/n) |
| Wild1, tranzpupy, Tenore, MichaelR, TokyoChas, Stefan, Dreamer, finter, tangram, Chris-A, Occu, disguised | Y |
| NLPerDude | Anyone got any questions about language patterns or stuff that we haven't touched on yet? |
| Tranzpupy | How about using language patterns on yourself? |
| NLPerDude | Since we talk to ourselves we are doing so already! I like to rephrase myself if I don't like what I hear coming from myself, so yes, though using language patterns on ourselves will be a bit diferent than with others. It's not likely that we'll be able to surprise ourselves with a reframe, for example! We can however, continuously generate positive language to move ourselves in a generative and positive direction. |
| Wild1 | Sometmes not in the best way |
| Tranzpupy | How about making them effective toward a desired outcome? |
| Dreamer | How about using language patterns to create rapport? |
| Stefan | You haven't talked much yet about anchoring, and then using the feelings anchored and presenting a suggestion at the same time? |
| Tenore | Is surprise a requisite for change, do you think? |
| Dreamer | It's like an anchor towards more positive thinking? |
| NLPerDude | Surprise is a major element in humor and reframing. It is not necessary for trance inductions, presuppositions, or most of the other patterns to work. |
| Tenore | Yes |
| finter | I find repeating things over and over in my head a certain phrase for example "I love wide open spaces" continuosly all day long very helpfull |
| NLPerDude | Yes an anchor to generate positive thinking, and it can also be reinforced with conscious intention. It's a way of making suggestions to ourselves. |
| Dreamer | So you know what you're doing, and that only makes it work better. |
| NLPerDude | Yes |
| Dreamer | Makes sense |
| NLPerDude | I'd like to make a few recommendations about learning the patterns. Writing them out is a great way to learn. I'd like to recommend Bandler's Persuasion engineering tapes. John La Valle did a great piece on language in them. After listening to the PE tapes I was really picking up on the ambiguities, like puns. They're GOOD! |
| Jonathan | Tape 3, I believe... La Valle discusses the structure of HUMOR. Not Jokes, but Humor! |
| Dreamer | Humor is a good way to create rapport |
| Wild1 | I will be over to borrow them Wesley!!! |
| Occum | I know that there is value in hearing the stuff, but is there more material on the tapes as well, vs. the book that is. |
| Jonathan | I might qualify that, Dreamer... Humor is a good way to increase the likelihood of rapport... getting people laughing is not rapport by itself... but it can HELP strongly pave the way to rapport. |
| Dreamer | Yes, I agree; Humor is not the only tool that one needs. |
| NLPerDude | Yes the tapes and book have different stories and teach some of the same patterns differently |
| Occum | Hmm maybe I'll get both then. |
| Jonathan | So those are a great source of language patterns! |
| Stefan | I tried the approach of having both a set of typical "Milton" words, and also having a few examples of structures of messages. Then you pick freely from those sets and throw something together. Worked nice for me. |
| Dreamer | But people tend to become more relaxed... if you make them laugh |
| Jonathan | I'll give everyone the homework assignment I got at a Bandler/ La Valle training, and which I give my students... Write FIFTY (50) of each of the following language ambiguity patterns: (1) Phonological Ambiguities (2) Syntactic Ambiguities (3) Punctuation Ambiguities (4) Scope Ambiguities |
| NLPerDude | Trance-Formations is great for examples of language and Larry McLauchlin's "Advanced Language Patterns Mastery" |
| Jonathan | Oh, GREAT references, Wesley! |
| Dreamer | Stefan... what words are those? |
| Stefan | The appendix of Trance-Formations has them. |
| Tangram | What's a scope ambiguity? |
| Jonathan | For that you have to do some research! OK! Lets tie it in together folks! |
| Tranzpupy | There are some exercises on the Larry McLauchlin web site... |
| Wild1 | Wes, would you say that getting out into the world a good way to practice??? |
| NLPerDude | Sure, Tom. Practice talkin' funny to folks and notice the responses. Have fun! |
| Wild1 | Hell, I do that already:) |
| Dreamer | LOL! |
| Jonathan | Wesley -- how would you prioritize the study of language patterns into an overall pursuit of mastery of NLP Techniques (prior to taking a training, of course) |
| NLPerDude | I'd start with reframing, making anything mean anything else...That would mean having lots of fun when you write out all of those ambiguities for Jon ;-) I'd learn them as one of the first things. If we can speak cleanly, then the words supporting our intentions we will have to communicate better. I'd recommend read Trance formations aloud , too. That's a fun way to learn new rythms and ways of using the words |
| Chris-a | If you don't do them jonathan's dog will bite you |
| Jonathan | Zoe'll come in and lick everyone. |
| Wild1 | Oh that feels gooood! A little to the left! |
| TokyoChas | Woah! pattern interrupt. Zoe? |
| Jonathan | Zoe is my German Shepherd |
| TokyoChas | :) |
| Tenore | Wes, what strikes you as the most important thing you have learned lately regarding these language patterns? |
| NLPerDude | Tenore, that I have a lot more to learn. And, that listening is more important than speaking |
| Tenore | I hear ya! |
| Jonathan | Sounds good... |
| Wild1 | Wesley is being modest... he is one of the MOST knowlegdable people around when it comes to language! |
| NLPerDude | As I said in the beginning the words aren't magic. WE can make magic by using words well, but there's more... Calibration, paying attention to the other person and noticing what their responses mean and will to be playful and even weird on occasson can be what mnakes the difference! Weird on occassion means to be outlandish. It gives the other person room to go outside of accostomed boundries sometimes. |
| Dreamer | You're kind of pacing pacing pacing leading, Wes? Mirroring is good, right? But i kind of find it difficult |
| Jonathan | Dreamer, mirroring is something we all unconsciously do well, some of the time. |
| NLPerDude | Mirroring is GREAT! I once had a client who said she wanted to be "gaunt" and sucked her cheeks in. |
| Jonathan | Its a matter of getting conscious control and practice with it! |
| NLPerDude | I mirrored it back. She looked at me and said, "that's really crazy, isn't it?" I agreed. She dropped that nonsense and developed a reasonable goal for her weight control program! |
| Jonathan | That's terrific, Wesley! |
| Dreamer | Jonathan, how about doing a chat about all those things? |
| Jonathan | There is a chat on Calibration now on the site, Dreamer! |
| Dreamer | Yes, I've downloaded it |
| Jonathan | I think now is a good time to wrap up! How would you like to do so? |
| NLPerDude | I'll be happy to field any more Questions |
| Jonathan | Well for starters then... HOW can people get in touch with you for changework? |
| NLPerDude | My phone is 770 310 5518 and email is wesley@cheerful.com |
| finter | I have one: I was gonna ask about UK english! There are many differences between American English etc. |
| moodswing | There are ABOUT 2500 different dialects in the US alone. Have the patterns worked well on foreigners as well as native english speakers? |
| Jonathan | The initial primary NLP models we have were done with English. Transformational Grammar studies were done mostly in English. But this has translated into many different languages, more or less effectively... French, Spanish, & German were among the first language alternatives to English in acquiring NLP training. I know a fellow in Istanbul by the name of Cengiz Eran -- who is working on a Turkish NLP model. |
| Tenore | Wes, have you or are you writing any books regarding language patterns? |
| NLPerDude | Tenore, none in the works. I have a full plate with work at the moment |
| Dreamer | Well... my question is... what type of language pattern is better to create rapport? |
| Stefan | And there are some Swedes working on a Swedish Meta Model. I haven't seen the result yet though. |
| Tenore | Wes, do you have a favorite quote or phrase that helps keep you on track as you go through your day at work helping others change? |
| Jonathan | Great Q, Tenore! |
| NLPerDude | What I have is the certainty that my clients CAN and WILL get their outcomes, no matter what hypnotic powers they try to use on me to make me think that they are hopeless! I take the long view. Erickson said that he never failded with a client, although he wasn't finished with all of them. |
| Jonathan | Well, alright folks... I'd like to wrap things up here -- firstly -- by thanking Wesley for hopping onstage and presenting some of the issues around NLP language patterns... And for being willing to offer his insight and assistance on the chat tonight. Give him a round of applause please.... |
| KevinMit | Applause! Very good... |
| Tranzpupy | Hip, hip hooray! |
| KevinMit | I'm filing Wes' presupposition away for use later tonight. |
| moodswing | Clap clap clap!!! |
| Wild1 | Claps for Wesley....let me rephrase that...... |
| finter | Applause |
| Occum | Applause |
| Tenore | Nice going, Wes! Many thanks and good luck! |
| NLPerDude | THank you one and all! |
| Stefan | Thanks Wes, great new ways of looking at this! |
| KevinMit | Thanks Wes. I didn't get to see the whole chat, but I'll check the transcript. And thanks, Jonathan. |
| Jonathan | Cool! Thanks Wesley! Meanwhile... for those who may be interested -- I have a few announcements for the Mastery InSight Institute -- (1) Products -- NEW tapeset "Finding Your Irresistable Voice" is now available. (2) Trainings: Washington DC, New York City, Toronto, Los Angeles, & Atlanta throughout the Fall... Those trainings are 3 single-day powerhouse skills-builders.... There is a lot more info on those trainings available. And we have the next scheduled Practitioner training in October! Thanks again for coming, and we'll see you at the next ones! |
[ Back to Top ] [ Back to Chat Index Page ]