July 3 2002
"Calibration?" What the heck is that?
Simply put -- it's another word for measurement. In the context of learning NLP -- how well you "calibrate" to another person, and their state of mind, and what's going on inside their minds -- determines to a significant degree how effective your communication will be with them.
The quality of your communication, both in terms of your enjoyment and the results of your communication, is dependent at least to some degree on your ability to calibrate to another person's emotional states, behavioral preferences, and patterns.
Calibration is highly useful. Snap judgements about what specific behaviors "mean" rarely are. In NLP terms, people often make quick generalizations with insufficient information. The fact is, almost no one behaves the same in multiple contexts. So calibration is great for determining someone's present state of mind, but it shouldn't be used to figure out how another person behaves -- all the time.
Calibration is simply about noticing what's going on with other people.
So, then, how do we develop these skills? How do we improve our ability to notice things? It's true that some of the best ways to do this are taught in seminars. But I think you would benefit by having some good ideas as to what you can do on your own, at least, to improve your general calibration skills.
To increase your calibration skills & your results, you must INITIALLY ALWAYS TEST your results with objective data. Without testing, there is no reliable increase in skill, and all your efforts in improving your calibration skills will be little more than a waste of time. There are few areas in NLP where external objective data is more important than it is in measuring the results of your developing calibration skills. Can't point this out enough. If you're presuming your results without backing that up with data, then your results are no better than guesswork. Only after we accept that and get used to seeking empirical data in measuring our calibration results -- do we improve. That's one of the reasons Study Groups are so important!
Most women, by the way, think men are blind to body-language. They've simply had more time & conditioning to learn about nonverbal communication than most men have. If you men on this list can learn to detect subtle signs in nonverbal behavior, women will be all the more appreciative of your attention. :)
It's useful to learn how to observe a LOT of nonverbal behaviors in people. Here are just a few of the many signals you might wish to learn to notice on a more regular basis. To learn how to do this without a lot of effort, I generally suggest taking this list, and while you're watching television, go through the list and give each listed item 5 minutes of tracking time. In other words, while you're watching TV, also watch for blinking rates/patterns in the shows you're watching, for 5 minutes, then track 5 minutes of head positions, etc. By themselves, NONE of these individual behaviors has any importance. The end-result we want, however, is eventually to be able to notice patterns of these signals, while we flirt, while we communicate, etc. And becoming good at noticing many different things is extraordinarily useful.
Remember that few if any of the above signals "mean" anything in & of themselves. Body Language is not about learning to attach some arbitrary meaning to each of the above. That's hokey. The real gold is in AVOIDING assigning our own meanings to what these signals mean to someone else, and to allow our own calibration skills to determine what each particular set of these & other signals means to someone else.
By letting our subjects teach us what each "set" of signals means, we avoid inappropriate mind-reading, and we learn how to communicate MOST effectively with each individual.
The typical example is in watching people who like to cross their arms, and making the mistake that that behavior MUST mean that they're closed to new ideas. Hokey. They might be very openminded, and just be most comfortable in that posture. So, with lots of calibration, we find out what each signal or set of signals means to each unique person. And then we can much more effectively read & understand another person's behavior.
[ Back to Top ] [ Back to Articles Index ]
All material is ©1997-2007 Jonathan Altfeld, unless otherwise noted. All rights reserved.