IRC Chat Pages [ Back to Chat Index Page ]
IRC Chat Log, January 24, 1999
| Jonathan | Hi, folks! Thanks for joining in tonight for another chat. Who here has read the book "Don't Shoot the Dog" by Karen Pryor? (y/n) |
| Eloquence | Yes |
| Tranzpupy, Venus | 1/2 |
| _Stile_, Paolo, IntriKate, Simon_UK, NLPSGI, Uranus, Tangram, NLP_D00D, FullStop, doRonRon, KingAmra | No |
| Jonathan | This chat will not be a "book report!" I do want to touch on a number of topics & issues she raised though! Because I think its a reasonably widely-held understanding that what she's written is perhaps the closest thing to using NLP with Animals in training --- and she writes about animal training in a way that is aimed also at helping us to learn how to train people better! So let's start there. And if you want to know more than people discuss here -- I encourage people to support her work and buy/read her book. |
| Jonathan | OK -- Karen's sections in the book -- as a quickie outline: REINFORCEMENT: Better Than Rewards SHAPING: Developing Super Performance STIMULUS CONTROL: Cooperation Without Coercion UN TRAINING: Using Reinforcement |
| NLPSGI | Hey, this is Husband Stuff! |
| Jonathan | Big Time! And Wife Stuff, too! |
| Tranzpupy | Or boyfriend stuff... Or BOSS stuff! |
| NLP_D00D | Or TEACHER stuff! |
| Jonathan | Oh boy, I know why you all came here! You think I'm going to start talking about SEX! LOL! |
| Finter | ...coughing... |
| doRonRon | Sex as reinforcement? Hmmm... |
| Eloquence | Sex is too sloooww... |
| NLPSGI | NO, NO, go on, we are sorry... Let's get back to animal training. |
| NLP_D00D | Animal Training? Like "doggie hypnosis"? |
| Jonathan | Yeah, Doggie Hypnosis! OK. There seem to be a whole lot of folks into NLP who've done some dog training. Joe Riggio, who has two chats on this web site, trained dogs for years... |
| NLPSGI | Including Richard Bandler! |
| Eloquence | There are only a few lines that are really important in her [Karen's] book. |
| Jonathan | Quentin! What did you learn of value from Karen? |
| Eloquence | Sex and reinforcement. Reinforcement requires INSTANT response. Anything positive must be reinforced instantly. How prepared are you, those who wish to train their husbands. |
| NLPSGI | Eloquently said. |
| Jonathan | And why does "Reinforcement only with Positive means" work better than both positive & negative Reinforcement? |
| Eloquence | Saves one decision. Therefore it can be unconsciously acted on. |
| NLPSGI | According to her, should negative also be immediately responded to? |
| Eloquence | Not as I recall. Leap in with a small reward at every positive. Not sex, a hint of sex. |
| NLPSGI | Hmmmm, so ignore negative and reinforce positive. |
| Eloquence | Yep. Less justification gets built into the relationship. |
| Jonathan | She pretty much ignores negative reinforcement; she's more interested in Timing of reinforcement, size of reinforcement, and schedules of reinforcement. |
| Tranzpupy | Just ignoring the negative works pretty well with human people... |
| Finter | So if someone is upset, ignoring them is better than comforting them? |
| Eloquence | No. |
| Venus | That would be awful, Finter. |
| Eloquence | Pick anything about what they are doing that is positive. |
| Simon_UK | But what if they are convinced that their "good" action is not good? Are you then reinforcing the negative? |
| Venus | Simon, can you give an example? |
| Simon_UK | Let's say that someone has low self-esteem. They perform a task well and you compliment. They however feel that the task was not worthy of your compliment. Thus we have a paradox. |
| NLPSGI | Ah, that is when you go with the facts. Don't start with their behavior; show them the Positive results, the real things they can not argue with -- the bottom line stuff -- then pace back to them. |
| Eloquence | Compliments are too slow. SMILE. |
| NLPSGI | So true, and easily argued by anyone, self-esteem or not. Chunk size is important when complimenting. |
| Jonathan | LOL Eloquence! Smile INSIDE & OUT. |
| Venus | Don't you think a compliment needs to be sincere? And, can you give an example, Kathleen? |
| NLPSGI | Yes. For example, if someone does a good job, and you tell them but they argue [the compliment], then show them the results: what did it accomplish? Increased sales? Or pile gone, things filed... whatever is physically different that you can demonstrate. |
| Venus | Oh, ok -- that's a good idea |
| Jonathan | Cool. Let them make the choice afterwards. |
| NLPSGI | Then pace back to them. |
| Venus | What does that mean in this example, Kathleen? |
| NLPSGI | External reference, then internal reference! So how does it feel to see that pile gone? |
| Venus | Oh, good!!! |
| Eloquence | Nice. |
| Simon_UK | And this may be accomplished in the informal environment of the workplace? |
| NLPSGI | Absolutely, Simon. |
| Jonathan | If that's after they've done the desired behavior, then -- that may be getting into what Pryor calls "shaping." |
| Venus | Shaping -- is that getting them to do more of the same? |
| Jonathan | Unless it's something they've been doing regularly but inconsistently. Let me be clearer! Reinforcing is about adjusting ongoing behaviors. Shaping is about creating new ones. Let's talk about it from an animal-training point of view and find out what it tells us! |
| Jonathan | I can distill Ms. Pryor's comments on Shaping to be based on Targeting, Mimicry, & Modeling. Targeting is about building a behavior with piecemeal elements... that string together bit by bit. |
| Venus | Like chaining states? |
| Jonathan | Yes, yes, yes! Venus gets the 1st Chocolate Bunny for the night!!! Great leap! |
| Venus | YAY! I finally got 1!!! :-) |
| NLPSGI | Wooo hooo! |
| Jonathan | Mimicry is something some animals do easily & well, so if you demonstrate, they follow. |
| Simon_UK | But does the mimicry show signs of "pacing"? |
| Jonathan | Yes, Simon, or more like Leading, so that they themselves pace you into learning what it is you want them to learn! |
| Venus | Does that ever really happen Jonathan? |
| Jonathan | Never, Venus, I'm sure its just a hopeful fantasy. *Wink!* |
| Venus | LOL! |
| Jonathan | And Modeling (according to Ms. Pryor's material, not a reference to 'NLP modeling') is pushing the subject through something. Like, handing your husband the garbage can and pushing him down the driveway. |
| Eloquence | Targeting would be smiling every time he went NEAR the garbage can. |
| Jonathan | Laura definitely didn't do that to me last night. No way, Jose. She didn't say "get off the computer and take the garbage out." She definitely didn't do that. |
| Venus | Hahaha! That's good to know! |
| Jonathan | Quentin -- you read the book too -- what did you learn from her discussion of shaping? |
| Eloquence | Smile when approaching man at computer. |
| Venus | So is this stuff best when its *nonverbal*? |
| Jonathan | Yes -- she mentioned 10 high-level rules for shaping -- (and categorized the 'short cuts' to shaping as the above 3) |
| Eloquence | Very specific steps. Reinforce any behavior that comes close to what you want. To teach a chicken to dance, give a small reward if it stands on one leg. Keep is small and within the half second rule. We don't want thinking here. |
| Jonathan | Yes indeed! I had some friends over a while back and Laura (who was our dog's primary trainer though I was involved) used many of Pryor's techniques to demonstrate something. She shaped a totally new behavior in under 5 minutes in front of the group. Quick & fun! |
| Simon_UK | Thus establishing a chain of "foody" anchors? |
| Jonathan | Yes, perhaps Simon -- One of the rules of thumb was, minimize the size of the reward -- and slowly make the reinforcement less easy to acquire. |
| Eloquence | Right on Simon, Absolutely. No sex in supermarkets. |
| Venus | LOL! |
| FullStop | So just one doggie treat instead of 10? |
| Jonathan | Here's an example with food -- tiny sliced hotdog's! Laura had a spot (a penny or bottle top) on the ground. You don't need to use food -- you can use a "clicker" too -- which is like auditory reinforcement. So she puts the spot on the ground -- and Zoe got the hotdog when she touched her nose to the spot. The 2nd time, she hit the spot faster. The 3rd time it was instant, but Laura was already on to building the next step. She put the spot elsewhere. Zoe went for it elsewhere and didn't get anything, but rapidly went back to the 1st place and then looked. Didn't get anything, then went to the new place and did. By the 3rd round, she was touching both spots. And she built a totally new sequence of behavioral choices that led to the reward. |
| Eloquence | Dancing dog routine |
| Simon_UK | Seems similar to back-propagation neural network programming to me. [Editor's note: I didn't respond to this at the time because it didn't suit the main thrust of the chat, but I think Simon's comparison was brilliant so I left it in!] |
| Jonathan | Laura got really good at shaping dog behaviors. I mean, I was cutting the lawn in half the time, Going from scrubbing dishes right to vacuuming, etc. Whew! |
| Venus | LOL! Hahaha! |
| doRonRon | :) |
| Jonathan | Interesting techniques. |
| NLPSGI | I'm taking notes! When John comes back from Europe, you are in trouble when he reads the chat log! |
| Jonathan | :) Tell me about it! Actually, don't tell me about it. Actually, let's talk about something completely different. |
| Venus | It'll be too late by then, Kathleen! |
| Eloquence | What I liked about her technique was the way in which it was the reverse of the usual paradigms for learning. |
| Jonathan | Yes! Quentin's right on the money! |
| Eloquence | Thanks. She moved from certainty to uncertainty. The trainee moves from the certainty of getting a small reward... |
| NLPSGI | Hmmm install and test. |
| Venus | Like memorizing your speech from the back to the front? |
| Jonathan | Venus, not in this case, at least I don't think so. |
| Venus | Oh |
| Jonathan | Here's why and Quentin can offer his ideas if he thinks I missed it. In the last chapter she talks of UN TRAINING behaviors. I think her entire book at a process level is about UN TRAINING OLD ideas about how best to train, to learn, and to condition, while she talks in entertaining (not ridiculous) and interesting ways about how much more elegantly and quickly people can learn. |
| Eloquence | When every positive response is instantly rewarded there is a certainty in that for the trainee. It is ONLY when it is time to move on to a new behavior that the rewards become less certain. |
| Jonathan | Quiz: Is she talking of learning how to train animals from what we've learned about human learning? Or is she talking of learning how to train people from what we've learned about animal learning? |
| Eloquence | She was talking about training people to train... whatever. |
| Jonathan | Or ANY permutation of the above? |
| NLPSGI | Ooooh, fancy word, Scooby Snack for Jonathan! |
| Jonathan | Permutation? *chomp chomp chomp* Thanks! Let's coalesce all this stuff together :) |
| NLPSGI | Ohhh, another one! |
| Venus | LOL! |
| Jonathan | Scooby Snack? |
| NLPSGI | Oh ok. |
| Jonathan | *chomp chomp chomp* |
| NLPSGI | But you are making a habit of this |
| Jonathan | YEAH, YEAH, habit! *chomp chomp chomp* Hey now... but he habit coming to him. |
| Eloquence | LOL |
| NLPSGI | I had a dog that would do that. He would go up to you and do every trick he knew just to get a treat. All of them at once! |
| Venus | So you trained a routine! |
| Eloquence | And then darn it you wanted to change it. |
| NLPSGI | How would this author describe this process? What did he learn to do? |
| Jonathan | I think Karen had something to say about that, actually. She suggested that behavior might come from a rapid withdrawal of reward from each behavior, rather than a slow withdrawal of the reinforcement. |
| NLPSGI | Huh. |
| Jonathan | That might lead to a rapid cycling-through of whatever the dog thought you wanted to see, because they expected every iteration of SOME behavior to get the response! |
| NLPSGI | Yes, well isn't that the process you described? Instant response to positive, consistently. |
| Jonathan | Yes, except -- over time -- the # of iterations of the same behavior that get the reward -- drops. Eventually, the animal gets the response to a much smaller # of times they do the behavior. |
| Eloquence | And it's less regular. |
| Jonathan | Yes, Quentin. No point in rewarding every third performance. They know when to perform. Trainers need random number generators. |
| NLPSGI | Tell that to my dog. |
| Jonathan | Tell it to your dog! LOL! Kathleen -- Both you & John already do this amazingly well with people, though! |
| NLPSGI | Well this was a long time ago Before John (BJ). Now I have a raptor. Well, actually, he's a Conure, but he thinks he is a raptor. We have one of those giant steel confinement units, with the alarms. |
| IntriKate | I have a Conure (small parrot), too! |
| Finter | Like a Canary |
| Paolo | lol |
| NLPSGI | Hey, Finter. You want to meet my canary? You wouldn't last 5 seconds! LOL! |
| Venus | LOL! |
| AccessNLP | Any tips for how to train a couple of Chihuahuas to STOP saying, "Yo quiero NLP!" |
| Jonathan | LOLOLOLO! Dave!!! ROTFL! For that, we'd be looking in the UN TRAINING section... |
| AccessNLP | Un training? What's the difference? |
| Jonathan | Karen Pryor might very well have said -- "If you take your Dog to Taco Bell, you'd better make a run for the border!" |
| Jonathan | Here in Florida, we have 1,500,000 tiny lizards we keep out in the yard. |
| AccessNLP | Everyone does this? |
| Jonathan | We train them to crawl over everything & hang out on the sliding glass doors. |
| Venus | Do their tails come off when you catch them? |
| Jonathan | Why catch them when I already feed them the local mosquitos? |
| NLPSGI | I have a bat in my back yard for that. |
| Jonathan | Baseball Bat? |
| NLPSGI | Richard bought us a bat-house for the yard and it has been great fun. It took a while for them to come. Two years. Gotta get the human smell off the wood. |
| AccessNLP | Cool! |
| Jonathan | That's wild! I suppose that would be a problem. Now another area of the book which might interest you NLPers -- is that Karen had quite a bit to say about ANCHORING. But... you wouldn't want to know more about that, I guess... |
| Venus | Yes we would!!! Tell us, tell us, tell us! Please? |
| Eloquence | No, no, tell us more! |
| Paolo | Responses ad infinitum... |
| Jonathan | Quentin -- do you hear any distant sharp piercing dog whistles? Karen gave a brief example of conditioned responses to stimuli -- with sharp whistles for herding dogs -- in NZ -- where "the countryside is wide and the dog may be far off." |
| Eloquence | Too true. It may even have been sent away if it is a hunterway. |
| Finter | 'get by Shep, get by' |
| Eloquence | Close Finter. Close. "Get by Shep, get by" is close. |
| Finter | The words "teaching your grandmother to suck eggs" come to mind when you mention sheep dog training. |
| Jonathan | OK, You'll LOVE this -- Karen Pryor defines 4 rules for perfect stimulus control (1) Desired behavior is immediate in response to stimuli (2) Behavior is reserved for whenever ONLY the stimuli occurs. (3) Behavior never occurs in response to other stimuli (4) No other behavior occurs when that stimuli is presented *chuckle* Now..... what does THAT set of conditions sound like to you? |
| Simon_UK | I'm wondering, immediate or adequate? |
| AccessNLP | Ummmmm.... values alignment? |
| Venus | Anchoring!!! |
| Paolo | Anchor? |
| Jonathan | Nice answers! What about congruence? |
| Paolo | Hmmm yeah! |
| Jonathan | Is the dog thinking "hm, should I sit? Or pee on his carpet?" |
| Venus | OK, LOL! |
| Simon_UK | Terribly unique anchoring - must be for very special cases. Or rather, its success will be better for more unique cases. |
| Paolo | No possibility for dilution there. |
| Jonathan | Perhaps. If anchoring is taught in a way that suggests it is best done with common signals, are they using unique enough anchors? I always keep in mind a list of anchoring conditions you can find in a number of the books. One of the interesting conditions is -- UNIQUENESS. |
| Eloquence | Good girl, Good girl |
| Jonathan | The more unique, the better, right? (that's not the only condition). |
| Simon_UK | Walking past a lamp-post is a common signal, does that elicit marking in dogs? |
| Jonathan | ROTFL -- nope -- but what it often does do is make it more likely for them to sniff the already-marked lamp-post. |
| Paolo | The lamp-post is only an anchor if another dog has marked it! Ha ha ha! |
| Jonathan | Yes Paolo! So it is an anchor, initially probably visual. But do we really know? Perhaps they first noticed it by olfactory! |
| Paolo | Bunny? Just kidding... |
| Jonathan | YES Paolo gets the 2nd Chocolate Bunny, in a bikini! |
| Paolo | Woohoo! |
| Venus | Yay, Paolo! |
| AccessNLP | I have a friend who taught his dog all the verbal commands in German |
| Jonathan | :) Was it an English Sheepdog? Or a Shih-tzu? |
| Simon_UK | (1) can we know, (2) do we need to know -- by what means the dog first responded to the lamppost anchor thing? Are we really interested in how the dog performs the task enough in order to decide what mental processes are going on. And indeed if they are usefully analogous to human responses. |
| Jonathan | Content wise, its curious, Process-wise, we all have our responses to stimuli... |
| Paolo | Do dogs have preferred rep systems? |
| Venus | Scent? |
| Eloquence | Definitely. It is how they define themselves and others. |
| Jonathan | If you put 1,000,000 drops of water in a vat, and 1 drop of urine along with it, supposedly dogs can smell that. Auditory & Olfactory are their major senses! |
| Eloquence | 1,000,000 drop of water = bathtub full |
| Paolo | Makes sense |
| Finter | Jonathan - where do get those anecdotes from about vats of water an urine :) |
| Jonathan | Oh, Finter, hang out long enough with a bunch of weirdo dog trainers and you hear all kinds of odd stories! |
| Finter | Hehe! |
| Venus | Boy, I'm glad I can't smell it! |
| NLPSGI | Gustatory too! I think that one works the best. |
| Jonathan | Mmmmmmmmmm, Chocolate Bunnies......... |
| Finter | Chocolate Bunnies - that's a rude English colloquialism |
| Jonathan | Aren't they all, Finter? |
| Finter | Yes, most of them, anyway! :) |
| Paolo | Whatever representational system they use in their reference structure. |
| Jonathan | As Quentin said (bears repeating) at least where dogs are concerned -- it might be useful to have a larger frame of understanding for THEIR sensory representational awareness. Best way to do that is to block out the other senses temporarily, like, wear eye-masks, and use earplugs, and have various scents brought near your nose. |
| NLPSGI | I guess aromatherapy would be good for the doggies: Essence of Bacon, Essence of Liver. Essence of cat, for stimulation. |
| Venus | LOL! Kathleen! |
| NLPSGI | Hmmmmm is there anyone using olfactory for training? |
| Jonathan | Great question! Is anyone using Olfactory!!!? I know one trainer ended up using it poorly one time. Man, did he eat the wrong things the night before. |
| NLPSGI | Hehehe |
| Simon_UK | So do dogs use mirroring to gain enhanced sensory perception? |
| Jonathan | Sometimes they do, Simon, Pryor calls that Mimicry. |
| Finter | Yes. |
| Eloquence | Dogs can pace and lead brilliantly. |
| Paolo | Heel, Fido! |
| Finter | Jonathan paces and leads his dog. |
| Jonathan | Yes -- I do use pacing & leading with my dog. |
| Venus | Really? |
| Eloquence | How pant pant? |
| Simon_UK | I have read on the newsgroup that such abilities lead to enhanced perception. |
| Jonathan | If its late at night, and she's energetic, I can pace & lead her from excited to asleep in under 10 minutes. Sometimes much faster, but 10 is a good outside number. |
| AccessNLP | Yep |
| Finter | So you mirror her breathing? |
| Eloquence | Holly used to pace my breathing when I was asleep till I followed her and then she would stop breathing. |
| Jonathan | Yes, along with blinks and posture. The baby is much faster, by the way. :) |
| Finter | You can pace and lead babies? Wow. My sister is due with her baby tomorrow, I will experiment. |
| Venus | Really, you can put the baby to sleep in under 10 min? |
| Jonathan | Sure. |
| Venus | That is *so* cool, Jonathan! |
| Jonathan | "Most of the time" its about 3-5 minutes. About 30% of the time, she's not even CLOSE to the mood for that. |
| thefool | I can put a baby to sleep in less than a minute... also a grownup. |
| Venus | No way. |
| thefool | It's called the "live long and prosper" touch. |
| NLPSGI | I know some dogs don't like it if YOU mimic them. |
| Jonathan | Yes! They often find it to be challenging! So, cross mirror. But as for mirroring dogs -- most of them pant so damn' fast -- you'd pass out, SO... breathe at exactly half-speed! |
| Finter | Do it in rhythm |
| Jonathan | Yes, get the same rhythm. |
| NLPSGI | Put my son to sleep every night! That way it teaches them to fall asleep naturally. It actually trains them how to fall asleep. |
| Venus | That's really nice, Kathleen! |
| Finter | I will try it when she has the baby, hopefully tomorrow |
| Jonathan | Too cool! Now, I'm pretty good about pacing & leading with Dogs, but I had NO clue how to do it with Cats. Rex Sikes once described how he does it: For pacing Cats, pace their breathing, then, stop, breathe reallllllly deeply, then pick up the pattern again. |
| Eloquence | Pace, speed up, STOP. That wakes them up. |
| Venus | When I sigh, Mercedes will sigh, too. And when I yawn, so will she. |
| Finter | Cats are a league unto their own. |
| NLPSGI | Babies, if you pace them, will fall asleep and learn how to fall asleep naturally. We can go into detail on how if we want to distract the animal thing for a min |
| Jonathan | We can! Because this was about what can we learn FROM this subject, and how it can be applied! |
| NLPSGI | I have another slightly different way; it still works as well. Doc told me that I should put my son in his crib and let him cry till he fell asleep. |
| Jonathan | Yup -- that's the T. Berry Brazelton Pattern-Interrupt for "dependent parents!" |
| doRonRon | That worked well with mine. |
| NLPSGI | Yet, he was premature and they did not want him to cry that much, so, I said let's try NLP. So I would put him on his tummy, and as he cried I patted his back in the rhythm of his crying, very fast but lightly at first. Then I would simply slow down a little at a time. Very simple, takes a few minutes, but its worth it. Then I would go so slow, that there would be one pat every 15 or 20 seconds. A pat, then stop. |
| Venus | Yeah, and it's painless for everybody! That's great! |
| Jonathan | WOW you slowed down much further than I did -- I'm going to try that!!! |
| NLPSGI | He would be asleep, worked every time. And the crying each night would lessen, and he would stop faster; I would have to slow down quicker to keep up with him. |
| Paolo | Very nice, Kathleen, wow. That's brilliant. |
| Simon_UK | I've seen mothers do that when they're rocking prams or holding the baby in their arms. |
| NLPSGI | This also trained him how to slow himself down and stop crying. |
| Tranzpupy | Wow, now if I could just pat myself! |
| Tangram | Wow. |
| NLPSGI | Trained him how to fall asleep to slow down his internal pace for deeper sleep, even if he was not crying. I put him to sleep this way. Great bonding and pacing. |
| Finter | Can I use that method to get out of bed in the morning, in reverse? LOL! |
| NLPSGI | Sure! |
| Venus | Sweet :-) |
| NLPSGI | I still rock back and forth on line; I'm trained. |
| Jonathan | I'm impressed. I'll try it out tonight! |
| Simon_UK | Hmm, interesting, as babies' visual development is not good, is there something else going on to achieve the pacing? |
| Finter | How does the person's unconscious mind pick up on your breathing (pacing & leading)? Is it purely auditory? |
| Simon_UK | It's almost as if there are two classes of senses, a coarse (everyday) sense system: and a subtle (NLP) sense system. |
| Finter | It happened to me so many times while I try it, I will sing a song, and the other person starts singing outload! |
| Jonathan | Finter -- about Breathing -- you play guitar, right? |
| Finter | Yes. |
| Jonathan | OK, Finter. When you tune a guitar, you play a note or harmonic on one string, and then another note or harmonic on another, right? What happens if they're not perfect? When you have both notes resonating together? Or -- at the same time, but not the same note? What happens? |
| Finter | Yeah they phase. I can hear phasing so acutely! I hear it, then I feel it, and I get different feelings for different phasing's. |
| Simon_UK | Perfect pitch is a matter of playing a lot. You then imagine the note. More often than not it is at perfect pitch. You have to feel confident though, in my experience as a cornet player. You just get to "know" that the note is right. It becomes very difficult when people are playing out of tune. Painful even! |
| Finter | Yeah |
| Jonathan | Yes. NOW. Breathing is exactly the same way. Try it out. |
| Finter | Wow, that's a great metaphor. |
| Simon_UK | Pacing is breathing in tune? |
| Jonathan | Yes, Simon... |
| Simon_UK | I'll try that out tomorrow at the department meeting. |
| Jonathan | Cool! |
| Finter | But how does the other person pick up on this? |
| Finter | In auditory fashion? |
| Simon_UK | Through their "subtle sensory system." |
| Finter | Which is a 6th sense? Is it a 6th sense Jonathan? |
| Jonathan | It's primarily kinesthetic for me. Some people train it "psychically" and the results their students achieved were spotty at best. |
| Jonathan | OK folks -- I'm wrapping it up -- let me take this moment to thank you for coming & for joining in! |
| Paolo | Thanks again for a cool topic and sharing with us a few more distinctions. Always appreciated. |
| Jonathan | Thank you all for coming. Its great to see everyone here and having fun and maybe even learning something together. I enjoyed your involvement! |
| doRonRon | Thanks, Jonathan, for having this session! |
| DLuzi, Tranzpupy | Thanks, Jonathan! |
| Jonathan | Thank you all! Thanks Dom, Kay, Kate & everyone! |
| IntriKate | G'nite! |
| Venus | Good night everybody, & thank you, Jonathan! |
[ Back to Top ] [ Back to Chat Index Page ]
Site-wide Links:
Home
What is NLP
Our NLP Trainer
What's Hot
Recommended Links
Site-Map
NLP Forum
NLP Learning Paths
NLP Articles
Free NLP Chat Transcripts
NLP Training
Online NLP Training
NLP DVDs CDs MP3s
Our NLP Catalog & Cart
NLP Chat Logs Links:
Chat Logs Index
NLP Skills Builders,
NLP Anchoring,
Calibration,
Introducing NLP,
Meta-Future-Pacing,
Pacing & Leading,
State Changes,
Submodalities & Synesthesia,
Belief Systems,
Meta-Programs & Flirt,
Meta-Programs,
Metaphors,
NLP Interventions,
Reality & Imagination,
Sleight of Mouth,
Strategy Pipelines,
Time Distortion,
Animal Training,
NLP & Sales,
Amplifying Allure!,
Problems Into Opportunities,
NLP & Small Business,
Everyday NLP,
How Best to Learn NLP?,
NLP & Advertising ,
NLP & Ethics,
NLP & Sexuality,
NLP Products,
NLP Practitioner Discussion,
Knowledge Engineering,
Meta-Model,
Milton-Model,
DHE Design Human Engineering,
Every Which Way & Loose!,
Being Amazed!,
NLP & Business Mgmt,
NLP & Consulting,
Making Sales Now!,
Pattern Detection/Utiliz.,
Joe Riggio 1,
Joe Riggio 2,
Patterns: Beyond Basics!,
Portuguese PNL Chat Logs:
NLP & Propaganda,
Como Melhor Aprender PNL? ,
NLP & Vendas
French PNL Chat Logs:
La Meilleure Façon d' Apprendre la NPL?,
NPL et La Publicité
Spanish PNL Chat Log:
la mejor manera de aprender PNL?
German NLP Chat Logs:
Wie Lernt Man Am Besten NLP? ,
NLP & Verkauf