Adaptability vs. Stuckness: Optimizing Thinking Patterns

Adaptability vs. Stuckness: Optimizing Thinking Patterns

Postby jaltfeld » Mon Jun 28, 2010 9:42 pm

I originally posted this through my Facebook profile. John H. suggested I share this through my forum. Good idea! :)

It's always easier afterwards, looking back... to track the arc of our development, and to see the evidence of our ability to adapt (or lack thereof).

The evidence is in the trail of our behaviors... but the "cause" of either "stuckness" or "flexibility" is in how we react to things, what we sort for. (And FYI...... this can be changed).

One of my coaching clients, somewhat like myself, has experienced a career arc that's taken them rather far away from the kind of thinking patterns they were trained in all through college. And as I've reflected on that, it seems apparent that the degree to which they've been successful in their new role is based on shifting values and beliefs. But the flip side of that is, the degree to which they're not yet as successful in that role as they'd like to be... is based on habitual mental patterns/filters. (Metaprograms, for NLP readers).

So the challenge for anyone who wants to get rid of less useful thinking patterns, and develop more useful ones... is all about changing what we sort for and how we process information/ideas. Example -- someone who looks for possibilities rather than exceptions. The engineer had better be or become able to find exceptions. The visionary had better be or become able to ignore them and shoot for the moon. Do you tend to look first for ways things are different? Or ways things are the same or recognized/valid? NLP may offer _some_ instant/rapid shifts... but changing metaprograms (core personality traits) takes time, willingness to work and think differently, and there's effort involved. Mistakes/setbacks do occur. But it's SO worth it...

Here's an example of the sameness vs difference in more 'layman' language:

When someone is speaking with you.... as they're talking... and you're listening... which do you do inside your head first, or more of?

* Do you think about what aspects of what they're saying are correct (or agreeable)?
* Or do you think about what aspects of what they're saying are incorrect (or that you know exceptions to)?

HOW we process information often dictates the quality of our relationships, our communication, our listening skills, our ability to fulfill the roles we've chosen (or that other people have chosen us for), etc. And how we communicate our responses, creates completely different perceptions about us, in other people's minds.

To what degree do you think you're processing your experiences optimally?

And are those processes/habits serving to help you be perceived the way you want to be?

There is no bad or good here -- I like to think of these sorting patterns as more or less useful for current/desirable results. The smaller-chunking and sort-by-difference patterns that are essential to high quality critical thinking from an engineer's perspective has a far less useful place in a top executive's role. Just as the pie-in-the-sky visionary thinking that an executive or high level entrepreneur needs, for convincing others of his vision for the future... is likely to cause some major trouble in an engineer's role (in terms of unanticipated technical hurdles).

Also, would you want to be married to the engineer's thinking patterns? Not if they couldn't leave that mindset at work when they came home each night. All of these patterns has at least some useful contexts -- more or less for each person's unique circumstances and roles.

The real challenge for most people is that "catching" yourself using these sorting patterns is extremely difficult, because these patterns are unconsciously habitual for us. And the more habitual/practiced they are, the harder they are for us to track. So it really helps to have a coach trained to track these patterns.

Here's another simple example. Have you ever known someone who was a "polarity responder?" Someone who always argues literally every point you make? You could tell them "you're a polarity responder" and they'd respond "No I'm not," at which point, they'd have proven your point, displaying the same trait in answering you the way they did.

Another example is asking a procrastinator when they're going to start learning to do things promptly, and they tell you "they'll get around to it eventually."

So perhaps the BIGGEST question is, what aren't you even remotely aware of, that's holding you back?

Maybe everyone should have a coach, who can hold up a friendly and supportive mirror to our less-useful patterns, outside of the context of our daily family/friend/co-worker relationships.

I've written about these subjects elsewhere in articles, etc... but thought you all might want to discuss these "sorting patterns" a bit. Find out how they're helping or hurting you!
Regards,
- Jonathan Altfeld
Forum/website owner/moderator & NLP Trainer
jaltfeld
Site Admin
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 2:06 pm
Location: Scotland, PA

Re: Adaptability vs. Stuckness: Optimizing Thinking Pattern

Postby bufo_marinus » Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:24 pm

IME, the styles of thinking that one learns in one context (and are essential for succeeding in that context) may be quite self limiting in another context. I've noticed that a lot of highly educated professionals in the financial arena are products of university systems where they are trained, as well as socialized, into expressing their thoughts in 5 page papers or 20 page papers or 100 pages theses.... resulting in a belief that "the right answer" has to fit into the formats they HAD to conform to grade at University... they learn to s-t-r-e-t-c-h their language so they can swell a 3 page idea into a 5 page idea or .shrnk. a seven page idea into a 5 page idea... and furthermore, a certain kind of objective, wizened tone must be employed, sort of a been there-done that, ho-hum.... of course as well all know... attitude that is usually a carefully calibrated response to what the professor believes is "right minded thinking"...

When I'm in communication with such folk, I often observe that a powerful insight can be delivered in a brief sentence or two, or an important observation about market behavior may be almost laughably simple.... I have the terriblest time getting them to accept that often clear eyed simplicity is far more useful than ornate over-talking a point... another self limiting behavior they picked up from seminars where they had sound knowledgeable.... one should say that the premium was on SOUNDING smart versus THINKING smart... the smartest were often those with the confidence to sound dumb, go out on a limb, test a hypothesis, and actually learn something. You could usually tell when someone was on to a train of thought worth following when the rest of the room got confused, flustered, and all too often defensively annoyed looks on their faces. That was the tell that you'd stepped off the consensus map and were breaking some new ground, not for gosh sake the smug comfortable nodding of pseudo-wisdom.
bufo_marinus
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 1:39 pm


Return to NLP for Changework (Therapy/Counseling/Coaching)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron